CHRISTOPHER J. FALVEY'S


TAKING NOTE OF VARIOUS THINGS










THE DAMNED LIBERAL MEDIA
Dec 26, 2004  |  Christopher J. Falvey



Its become fashionable to have the a mass media conspiracy against one's brand of politics. Unfortunately, media bias is more subtle- and more dangerous- than that.




The recent trendiness of politics has brought unbridled partisanship into the mainstream dialog. Where once you heard talk of soap operas and football, you now hear talk of the elitism of the left and archaic morals of the right. And the liberal media. (Or is it the conservative media?)

For starters, we need to properly define Liberalism and Conservatism. Or, more appropriately, for the purposes of analyzing politics in the media, we need to divide both Liberalism and Conservatism into respective classifications of simple and the complex.

Both Liberalism and Conservatism do come in fairly complex flavors. The world's problems aren't simple, and aren't- at least in terms of real-world policy and solutions- attacked with simple political philosophies. I would argue that the intricate complexities of Liberalism and Conservatism are truly what make America go 'round. But complexity doesn't sell newspapers.

The mass-market national debate has come between Simple Liberalism vs. Simple Conservatism. People like to think that that the answers to the world's problems are simple.

For the left-leaning: if we could make sure the poor aren't so poor, and the rich aren't so rich. If we could just get along regardless of race or sexual orientation. If America could just be a good citizen in the World community. And so on, and so forth.

For the right-leaning: if we could all just understand and hold good ol' American values. If we just had lower taxes. If we just kick some ass in the name of democracy. And so on, and so forth.

The specific characteristics of the two camps of mass political thought in America are important here. Content is what the media is in the business of delivering (in exchange for you watching their advertisements), and content is where bias begins. But not for the reasons most people argue.

Despite what the conspiracy theorists may say, the media only reports what people want to hear. The media wants eyeballs, plain and simple. Eyeballs sell advertising. However, the fact that the country is pretty much divided 50/50 between Simple Liberalism and Simple Conservatism does not lend to the media being biased in either direction.

Then why the rumors of a Liberal Media? Then why, when asked by a variety of non-partisan surveys, do 75% to 80% of the members of the media state that they vote Democrat? It comes down to content.

When discussing media bias, its important to separate fact-based media from opinion-based media. (With the advent of 24-hour cable news and talk radio, opinion-based media has seen such a expansion recent years, that its not uncommon for people to confuse opinion and fact when it comes to the news. More often that not it's because they don't want to differentiate between the two.) Nevertheless, let's focus on the standard, fact-based, everyday news. We all know Rush Limbaugh and Al Franken are biased. They're supposed to be, and they're not veiling their biases. The news itself, unfortunately, is another story.






1 | 2  
print 
email story 

vnvo.com rss



NAME:
EMAIL:
COMMENT:
(optional)
ALERT ME:    (alerts to new articles)
  { send }



LIFE AND HOW IT'S LIVED
DESIGNED FOR TV: AMERICA'S NEW CULTURAL WELFARE STATE

After having my humble home re-designed for television, I realized the deeper meaning of a new trend in television: where the theme of voyeurism has been replaced by that of personal re-birth. As society's concept of success itself has become democratized, "achievement" has become deserved, and opulence can seemingly be found with little risk. Or can it? The unseen downside of this cultural movement may be quite perilous.

MEDIUM AND MESSAGE
SELLING INCLUSION: PARTISAN COMEDY AND THE DECLINE OF PERSONAL POLITICS

My recent trip to a Bill Maher show illustrates what this phenomenon of partisan comedy really means in the grand scope of politics, and how its helped change the political landscape. What I found was that the crux of our politics is moving from separate ideas to package-deal inclusion. What does this mean for the future of political thought?

LIFE AND HOW IT'S LIVED
WAR ON TERROR, WAR OF CULTURE

The war on terror, as it is presently constituted, will fail. Not because of a lack of military might or strategy, but rather because we're forgetting the one great weapon that has won all previous wars we've been involved in: our culture.

Originally published in:
  > The Seattle Times
  > Philadelphia Daily News
ECON/RECON
THE VALUE CHASM: FAKE PRADA HANDBAGS AND TERRORISM

We hear a lot about the connection between terrorism and the black market. But what really causes this? The issue at hand is a value chasm: where illogical thinking and irrational consumerism has caused us to value certain items far beyond reasonable, and thus a black market is created.

MEDIUM AND MESSAGE
FRACTION OF A VISION: POLITICAL DOCUMENTARIES VS. MUNDANE REALITY

With the expansion of the importance of political documentaries on our culture, and conflict has arisen: the dichotomy between the sensational (and often treacherous) vision of the world as seen through this new media, and the realities of the mundane world of factual cause-and-effect. To the masses, life keeps getting worse and something must be done about it. Reality- though mundane- actually shows us something different.

Originally published in:
  > Irish American Post
  > East Valley Tribune (AZ)





Copyright © 2004-2008, Christopher J. Falvey and THE VN/VO. All Rights Reserved.

Terms of Service: Content from THE VN/VO site, including but not limited to text, articles, images may not be copied, reposted, broadcast, or disseminated in any form without the express written permission of Christopher J. Falvey.